From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alex Ignatov <a(dot)ignatov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Why we don't have checksums on clog files |
Date: | 2016-06-13 12:01:05 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaCsmKfB_Sv0QOMJ2wjPcY7U4N8y=sk=Y3ztxSpoCfJNg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 10:54 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> I think it will be better if users can have an option to checksum clog
>>> pages. However, I think that will need a change in page (CLOG-page) format
>>> which might not be a trivial work to accomplish.
>
>> Doesn't the pd_checksum field exist on SLRU pages also?
>
> Uh, no.
>
> (I don't think that's an inherent property of slru.c, but definitely
> clog.c packs the pages totally fully of xact status bits. See
> CLOG_XACTS_PER_PAGE.
Oh. Well, that makes it harder, then.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ants Aasma | 2016-06-13 13:10:16 | Re: WIP: Data at rest encryption |
Previous Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2016-06-13 09:42:31 | Re: Rename max_parallel_degree? |