Re: [CORE] postpone next week's release

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-core <pgsql-core(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [CORE] postpone next week's release
Date: 2015-05-29 22:02:36
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoa6hekDGenr29TG_K4bH7rxLEM9RU+5KDAiY+SiAsFhew@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> I'm personally kind of astonished that we're even thinking about beta
>> so soon. I mean, we at least need to go through the stuff listed
>> here, I think:
>> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.5_Open_Items
>
> Well, maybe we ought to call it an alpha not a beta, but I think we ought
> to put out some kind of release that we can encourage people to test.
> What you are suggesting is that we serialize resolution of the known
> issues with discovery of new issues, and that's not an efficient use of
> time. Especially seeing that we're approaching the summer season where
> we won't get much input at all.

Well, I think we ought to take at least a few weeks to try to do a bit
of code review and clean up what we can from the open items list.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2015-05-29 22:08:13 Re: RFC: Remove contrib entirely
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-05-29 21:54:51 Re: RFC: Remove contrib entirely