Re: Windows port minor fixes

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ranier Vilela <ranier_gyn(at)hotmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Windows port minor fixes
Date: 2019-12-18 15:44:02
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoa607Rk92PQnnNGq0ge76o3erK_4YvKEV9u4ONXnc=f0g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 9:06 AM Ranier Vilela <ranier_gyn(at)hotmail(dot)com> wrote:
> De: Michael Paquier
> Enviadas: Terça-feira, 17 de Dezembro de 2019 04:45
> >And if you actually group things together so as any individual looking
> >at your patches does not have to figure out which piece applies to
> >what, that's also better.
> I'm still trying to find the best way.

A lot of your emails, like this one, seem to be replies to other
emails, but at least in my mail reader (gmail) something you're doing
is causing the threading to get broken, so it's very hard to know what
this is replying to.

Also, the way the quoted material is presented in your emails is quite
odd-looking.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2019-12-18 15:48:09 Re: Request to be allotted a project or a feature in pipeline
Previous Message Robert Haas 2019-12-18 15:36:52 Re: [HACKERS] pg_shmem_allocations view