Re: Windows port minor fixes

Greetings,

* Robert Haas (robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 9:06 AM Ranier Vilela <ranier_gyn(at)hotmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > De: Michael Paquier
> > Enviadas: Terça-feira, 17 de Dezembro de 2019 04:45
> > >And if you actually group things together so as any individual looking
> > >at your patches does not have to figure out which piece applies to
> > >what, that's also better.
> > I'm still trying to find the best way.
>
> A lot of your emails, like this one, seem to be replies to other
> emails, but at least in my mail reader (gmail) something you're doing
> is causing the threading to get broken, so it's very hard to know what
> this is replying to.

I'm reasonably confident (though I can't be sure about gmail, but I see
the same thing in mutt) the issue here is that there's no References or
In-Reply-To headers in the emails. There's some 'Thread-Subject' and
'Thread-Index' headers but it seems that gmail and mutt can't sort out
what those are or how to use them to do proper threading (if it's even
possible with those headers.. I'm not really sure how you'd use the
'Thread-Index' value since it seems to just be a hex code..).

> Also, the way the quoted material is presented in your emails is quite
> odd-looking.

Yeah, agree with this too, though that bothers me somewhat less than the
threading issue.

Thanks,

Stephen