| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Ian Barwick <ian(dot)barwick(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: let's make the list of reportable GUCs configurable (was Re: Add %r substitution for psql prompts to show recovery status) |
| Date: | 2019-07-11 19:06:52 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmoa-wUrw3vgtR6u10G10-3FeCidHuQva8xaXWEvjKeU2Tg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 2:29 PM Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> wrote:
> So if I understand this correctly if user bob has altered his search path and there is a security-definer function called owned by him then
> the search path will be changed for the duration of the function and reported for every iteration? The implications of this are "interesting" to say the least.
I don't believe that it matters what search path has been set using
ALTER USER bob. But it does matter whether there is a SET function
attached to the function definition. If you're not familiar with
this, reread the CREATE FUNCTION docs... it's a cool feature. And of
course the function could also have an explicit SET inside of it, or
several of them.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2019-07-11 19:07:20 | Re: base backup client as auxiliary backend process |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2019-07-11 18:54:42 | Re: buildfarm's typedefs list has gone completely nutso |