Re: base backup client as auxiliary backend process

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: base backup client as auxiliary backend process
Date: 2019-07-11 19:07:20
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZsOQTvvcYAxxwinD5DZ2WC0mBL8oknwsT1dEX5xm0XaQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 10:36 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Gotta have config files in place already, no?

Why?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Cramer 2019-07-11 19:15:55 Re: let's make the list of reportable GUCs configurable (was Re: Add %r substitution for psql prompts to show recovery status)
Previous Message Robert Haas 2019-07-11 19:06:52 Re: let's make the list of reportable GUCs configurable (was Re: Add %r substitution for psql prompts to show recovery status)