| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: plpgsql extension install nitpick |
| Date: | 2011-07-03 19:10:12 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmoa-QUoT1sA6Qof+Uqpy52mmzh9fDPg2JVDOSHtmmnhNnw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>> On lör, 2011-07-02 at 23:22 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> [ don't want to put duplicate comments on PLs and their extensions ]
>
>> Well, you still write functions in the language and refer to it in the
>> SQL commands, so it is reasonable to know about the language as opposed
>> to the extension it is in. You wouldn't remove man pages just because
>> an RPM package description exists.
>
> Well, if I'm in the minority I'll yield gracefully. Anybody else have
> an opinion?
I don't see any harm in commenting it in both places.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2011-07-03 19:18:52 | Re: Deriving release notes from git commit messages |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2011-07-03 19:06:48 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Enable CHECK constraints to be declared NOT VALID |