Re: plpgsql extension install nitpick

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: plpgsql extension install nitpick
Date: 2011-07-03 16:33:48
Message-ID: 29343.1309710828@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> On lr, 2011-07-02 at 23:22 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> [ don't want to put duplicate comments on PLs and their extensions ]

> Well, you still write functions in the language and refer to it in the
> SQL commands, so it is reasonable to know about the language as opposed
> to the extension it is in. You wouldn't remove man pages just because
> an RPM package description exists.

Well, if I'm in the minority I'll yield gracefully. Anybody else have
an opinion?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-07-03 16:46:15 Re: Deriving release notes from git commit messages
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2011-07-03 14:23:15 Re: %ENV warnings during builds