| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes |
| Date: | 2018-05-11 03:25:58 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZzdNsTFmmt+wTtCn0hQ+1F=OEG6ptbSRbi6prqVa97Cg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 2:48 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> I still don't think, as commented upon by Tom and me upthread, that we
> want this feature in the current form.
Was this concern ever addressed, or did the patch just get committed anyway?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-05-11 03:32:27 | Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes |
| Previous Message | David Rowley | 2018-05-11 02:22:33 | Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled? |