Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes
Date: 2018-03-01 19:48:24
Message-ID: 20180301194824.46ivyszju2ivhlh5@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

I still don't think, as commented upon by Tom and me upthread, that we
want this feature in the current form.

Your arguments about layering violations seem to be counteracted by the
fact that ProjectionIsNotChanged() basically appears to do purely
executor work inside inside heapam.c.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2018-03-01 19:49:26 Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries
Previous Message David Steele 2018-03-01 19:45:22 Re: Re: Suspicious call of initial_cost_hashjoin()