From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Postgres_fdw join pushdown - wrong results with whole-row reference |
Date: | 2016-06-24 19:14:46 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZwB5tYTBPzAfeXyJv+HY0ycottQxScKoj132EWjNuVWw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 4:11 AM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> In an outer join we have to differentiate between a row being null (because
>> there was no joining row on nullable side) and a non-null row with all
>> column values being null. If we cast the whole-row expression to a text
>> e.g. r.*::text and test the resultant value for nullness, it gives us what
>> we want. A null row casted to text is null and a row with all null values
>> casted to text is not null.
>
> You are right. There may be non-null rows with all columns null which are
> handled wrongly (as Rushabh reports) and the hack I proposed is not right
> for. Especially if from non-nullable side as in the reported case, NULL
> test for such a whole-row-var would produce the wrong result. Casting to
> text as your patch does produces the correct behavior.
I agree, but I think we'd better cast to pg_catalog.text instead, just
to be safe. Committed that way.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-06-24 19:16:58 | Re: Postgres_fdw join pushdown - wrong results with whole-row reference |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-06-24 19:04:28 | Re: Odd behavior with domains |