| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, Maciek Sakrejda <m(dot)sakrejda(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints |
| Date: | 2022-03-22 15:55:05 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZtm993Zq+NtwVe8F2bv3oWZ0rUyifHA7B9TBbo+AwYpg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 11:42 AM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> I might have missed it because I just skimmed the patch. But I still think it
> should contain a comment detailing why accessing catalogs from another
> database is safe in this instance, and perhaps a comment or three in places
> that could break it (e.g. snapshot computation, horizon stuff).
Please see the function header comment for ScanSourceDatabasePgClass.
I don't quite see how changes in those places would break this, but if
you want to be more specific perhaps I will see the light?
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Melih Mutlu | 2022-03-22 16:00:42 | Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2022-03-22 15:49:59 | Re: preserving db/ts/relfilenode OIDs across pg_upgrade (was Re: storing an explicit nonce) |