Re: preserving db/ts/relfilenode OIDs across pg_upgrade (was Re: storing an explicit nonce)

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Shruthi Gowda <gowdashru(at)gmail(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sadhuprasad Patro <b(dot)sadhu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Kincaid <tomjohnkincaid(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: preserving db/ts/relfilenode OIDs across pg_upgrade (was Re: storing an explicit nonce)
Date: 2022-03-22 15:49:59
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYjDb=usFk3bWWWobx36NU3AJ_ekBxPxD5DDWNY3RwNMg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 8:52 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> I noticed this still has an open CF entry: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/37/3296/
> I assume it can be marked as committed?

Yeah, done now. But don't forget that we still need to do something on
the "wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode
changes Reply-To:" thread, and I think the ball is in your court
there.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2022-03-22 15:55:05 Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2022-03-22 15:48:45 Re: New Object Access Type hooks