| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Exorcise "zero-dimensional" arrays (Was: Re: Should array_length() Return NULL) |
| Date: | 2013-04-03 16:51:36 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZqTPJyrcfAJwRB9X2a3vttuEr-FxT3PRoeGDFR8Aa3PQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 12:36 PM, David E. Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> wrote:
> On Apr 3, 2013, at 9:30 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Fortran ... Basic ... actually I'd have thought that zero was a
>> minority position. Fashions change I guess.
>
> I say we turn the default lower bound up to 11.
+1. I think that's clearly a compromise position that will make
everyone equally happy.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2013-04-03 16:55:05 | Re: regression test failed when enabling checksum |
| Previous Message | Jeff Janes | 2013-04-03 16:48:54 | Re: regression test failed when enabling checksum |