Re: regression test failed when enabling checksum

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: regression test failed when enabling checksum
Date: 2013-04-03 16:55:05
Message-ID: 20130403165505.GB27856@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2013-04-03 09:48:54 -0700, Jeff Janes wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 2:31 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>wrote:
>
> >
> >
> I just checked and unfortunately your dump doesn't contain all that much
> > valid WAL:
> > ...
> >
>
>
> > So just two checkpoint records.
> >
> > Unfortunately I fear that won't be enough to diagnose the problem,
> > could you reproduce it with a higher wal_keep_segments?
> >
>
> I've been trying, but see message "commit dfda6ebaec67 versus
> wal_keep_segments".

Setting up an archive_command could help if its affordable from the
space perspective :/

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2013-04-03 17:09:15 Re: Regex with > 32k different chars causes a backend crash
Previous Message Robert Haas 2013-04-03 16:51:36 Re: [PATCH] Exorcise "zero-dimensional" arrays (Was: Re: Should array_length() Return NULL)