| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | btsugieyuusuke <btsugieyuusuke(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_walsummary, Character-not-present-in-option |
| Date: | 2024-10-03 17:19:23 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZqFrn18BtEL-JjmuPZURHNSB9a6+nC_omf0vwR4hX2fg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 12:08 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> btsugieyuusuke <btsugieyuusuke(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> writes:
> >> Therefore, shouldn't “f:” and “w:” be removed?
>
> Looks like that to me too. Pushed.
Thanks to Yusuke-san for the report and patch and to Tom for the
commit. I vaguely recall that early in the development of
pg_walsummary I thought it was going to need more options than and
then realized that some of them weren't necessary. Looks like I did a
bad job removing the leftovers; thanks for cleaning it up.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alena Rybakina | 2024-10-03 17:35:48 | Re: On disable_cost |
| Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2024-10-03 17:12:47 | Re: Enhance file_fdw to report processed and skipped tuples in COPY progress |