Re: pg_walsummary, Character-not-present-in-option

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: btsugieyuusuke <btsugieyuusuke(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_walsummary, Character-not-present-in-option
Date: 2024-09-30 16:08:11
Message-ID: 1474982.1727712491@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

btsugieyuusuke <btsugieyuusuke(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> writes:
>> Therefore, shouldn't “f:” and “w:” be removed?

Looks like that to me too. Pushed.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2024-09-30 16:20:00 Re: BUG #18641: Logical decoding of two-phase commit fails with TOASTed default values
Previous Message Matthias van de Meent 2024-09-30 15:55:37 Re: AIO v2.0