Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6
Date: 2015-08-12 20:25:17
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZkCfjoCM66hzGFH4Lo2mG05P7AFLX8uZkw0pJy5oeLFg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> The only actual separate patch since then (fastgetattr as inline
> function) was posted 2015-08-05 and I yesterday suggested to push it
> today. And it's just replacing two existing macros by inline functions.

I'm a little concerned about that one. Your testing shows that's a
win for you, but is it a win for everyone? Maybe we should go ahead
and do it anyway, but I'm not sure.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2015-08-12 20:34:38 Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-08-12 20:21:58 Re: WIP: SCRAM authentication