| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: WIP: SCRAM authentication |
| Date: | 2015-08-12 20:21:58 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYRkGAYC8XAz91qiwDK=wEqXgUbCoaPgiZDnde0cMSj5Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> As for the notion of dropping md5 from 9.6 or even forcing it to be
> one-or-the-other on a per-role basis, ...
Please don't conflate those two things. They are radically different
in terms of the amount of upgrade pain that they cause. The first one
would be completely insane.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-08-12 20:25:17 | Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6 |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2015-08-12 20:09:38 | Re: WIP: SCRAM authentication |