| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Steven Pousty <steve(dot)pousty(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pierre Giraud <pierre(dot)giraud(at)dalibo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? |
| Date: | 2020-04-17 20:14:04 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZdX2nhx6YgkegeN3SQzj9GYQoDqQE8sxD7sGpTkZyXbw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 3:58 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> On the other point of dispute about the operator tables: for the
> moment I'm leaning towards keeping the text descriptions.
I mostly suggested nuking them just to try to make the table more
readable. But since you've found another (and better) solution to that
problem, I withdraw that suggestion.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-04-17 20:20:42 | Re: return value from pq_putmessage() is widely ignored |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-04-17 19:58:04 | Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? |