| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Steven Pousty <steve(dot)pousty(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pierre Giraud <pierre(dot)giraud(at)dalibo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? |
| Date: | 2020-04-17 20:22:26 |
| Message-ID: | 25086.1587154946@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 3:58 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> On the other point of dispute about the operator tables: for the
>> moment I'm leaning towards keeping the text descriptions.
> I mostly suggested nuking them just to try to make the table more
> readable. But since you've found another (and better) solution to that
> problem, I withdraw that suggestion.
Cool, then we're all on the same page. I shall press forward.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2020-04-17 20:39:43 | Re: snapshot too old issues, first around wraparound and then more. |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-04-17 20:20:42 | Re: return value from pq_putmessage() is widely ignored |