Re: broken documentation: BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnection(NULL, NULL);

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: broken documentation: BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnection(NULL, NULL);
Date: 2015-05-15 20:16:48
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZXpVf=za0i7hhYX2o_noVJsNnTW5eSk9ehv8aE6WR_kQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> Really? I was thinking of the test code as throwaway. I just wanted
>> to fix the bug.
>
> Oh, that's fine then. I thought you wanted to push it.

Nah, sorry, I shoulda been more clear about that. That was just so I
could actually be sure I had the fix right.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2015-05-15 20:21:32 Re: Problems with question marks in operators (JDBC, ECPG, ...)
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-05-15 20:15:57 Re: broken documentation: BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnection(NULL, NULL);