Re: broken documentation: BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnection(NULL, NULL);

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: broken documentation: BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnection(NULL, NULL);
Date: 2015-05-15 20:15:57
Message-ID: 20150515201557.GJ2523@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > Robert Haas wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> >> > The test code I used to verify that this works is also attached.
> >> >
> >> > If there are no objections, I will commit and back-patch.
> >>
> >> Oops. Really attached this time.
> >
> > We have spi_worker in src/test/modules now -- I think it makes sense to
> > add this one there too in master.
>
> Really? I was thinking of the test code as throwaway. I just wanted
> to fix the bug.

Oh, that's fine then. I thought you wanted to push it.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2015-05-15 20:16:48 Re: broken documentation: BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnection(NULL, NULL);
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-05-15 20:15:37 Re: log bloating with shortlife bgworkers?