From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: standby recovery fails (tablespace related) (tentative patch and discussion) |
Date: | 2022-03-28 14:37:04 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZXTYEOPQVMW4TSPtcxsFEu6=h7UWJWv58TmBytT-6zMg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 8:26 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> On 2022-Mar-21, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > I had a look at this latest version of the patch, and found some things
> > to tweak. Attached is v21 with three main changes from Kyotaro's v20:
>
> Pushed this, backpatching to 14 and 13. It would have been good to
> backpatch further, but there's an (textually trivial) merge conflict
> related to commit e6d8069522c8. Because that commit conceptually
> touches the same area that this bugfix is about, I'm not sure that
> backpatching further without a lot more thought is wise -- particularly
> so when there's no way to automate the test in branches older than
> master.
>
> This is quite annoying, considering that the bug was reported shortly
> before 12 went into beta.
I think that the warnings this patch issues may cause some unnecessary
end-user alarm. It seems to me that they are basically warning about a
situation that is unusual but not scary. Isn't the appropriate level
for that DEBUG1, maybe without the errhint?
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2022-03-28 14:51:37 | Re: role self-revocation |
Previous Message | Justin Pryzby | 2022-03-28 14:33:19 | Re: [WIP] Allow pg_upgrade to copy segments of the same relfilenode in parallel |