Re: role self-revocation

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Joshua Brindle <joshua(dot)brindle(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: role self-revocation
Date: 2022-03-28 14:51:37
Message-ID: 20220328145137.GG10577@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Greetings,

* Robert Haas (robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 1:10 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > > However, it might. And if it does, I think it would be best if
> > > removing that exception were the *only* change in this area made by
> > > that release.
> >
> > Good idea, especially since it's getting to be too late to consider
> > anything more invasive anyway.
>
> I'd say it's definitely too late at this point.

Agreed.

> > > So I propose to commit something like what I posted here:
> > > http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmobgeK0JraOwQVPqhSXcfBdFitXSomoebHMMMhmJ4gLonw@mail.gmail.com
> >
> > +1, although the comments might need some more work. In particular,
> > I'm not sure that this bit is well stated:

Also +1 on this.

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nikola Ivanov 2022-03-28 15:05:19 Re: SQL/JSON: functions
Previous Message Robert Haas 2022-03-28 14:37:04 Re: standby recovery fails (tablespace related) (tentative patch and discussion)