Re: can we mark upper/lower/textlike functions leakproof?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: can we mark upper/lower/textlike functions leakproof?
Date: 2024-08-01 11:57:05
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZQBe9BHzMNMr3_QW_9DjDBpw-+ZQWoqVV1v0f0rrh6ug@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 4:42 PM Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> wrote:
> You are assuming that everyone allows direct logins with the ability to
> create procedures. Plenty don't.

Well, if you can send queries, then you can do the same thing, driven
by client-side logic.

If you can't directly send queries in any form, then I guess things
are different. But I don't really understand what kind of system you
have in mind.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Junwang Zhao 2024-08-01 12:32:11 Re: [Patch] remove duplicated smgrclose
Previous Message Yasir 2024-08-01 11:57:04 Re: Memory growth observed with C++ application consuming libpq.dll on Windows