Re: Incorrect overflow check condition for WAL segment size

On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Markus Nullmeier
<dq124(at)uni-heidelberg(dot)de> wrote:
> On 11/08/16 18:12, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:01 AM, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> I've attached a patch to fix this.
>>> Good catch. Interesting copy-pasto from 88e9823.
>> Committed.
>
> Hmm, somehow this fix (60379f66c8 for master) does not seem to appear
> in the 9.5 and 9.6 branches, yet the latter both include commit 88e9823.

It didn't seem important to back-patch it, so I didn't. It also
occurred to me that there was a small chance of breaking the build for
somebody who is skating by today, which would annoy that person
without being likely to benefit anyone else.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company