| From: | Markus Nullmeier <dq124(at)uni-heidelberg(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Incorrect overflow check condition for WAL segment size |
| Date: | 2016-11-09 17:54:58 |
| Message-ID: | 38e14b52-94f1-756b-8970-1ae8d428eb1a@ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/08/16 18:12, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:01 AM, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> I've attached a patch to fix this.
>> Good catch. Interesting copy-pasto from 88e9823.
> Committed.
Hmm, somehow this fix (60379f66c8 for master) does not seem to appear
in the 9.5 and 9.6 branches, yet the latter both include commit 88e9823.
--
Markus Nullmeier http://www.g-vo.org
German Astrophysical Virtual Observatory (GAVO)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-11-09 17:55:51 | Re: Is user_catalog_table sensible for matviews? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-11-09 17:17:42 | Is user_catalog_table sensible for matviews? |