Re: About that re-release ...

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: About that re-release ...
Date: 2015-05-28 03:08:58
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZHb4mKqwmXdtHhFD+0xgqRj2A-AKEd7vAbGvOZZP_55A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 11:08 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Assuming that we can get a fix for the fsync-failure-during-restart
>>> problem committed by the end of the week, there will be a new set of
>>> back-branch minor releases next week. Usual schedule, wrap Monday
>>> for public announcement Thursday.
>
>> What about http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20150527222142.GE5885@postgresql.org
>> ?
>
>> I believe that is also a 9.4.2 regression, and a serious one.
>
> Oh? There was nothing in the thread that suggested to me that it was
> a new-in-9.4.2 bug.

I think it is.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-05-28 03:41:29 Re: fsync-pgdata-on-recovery tries to write to more files than previously
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-05-28 03:08:01 Re: About that re-release ...