| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: About that re-release ... |
| Date: | 2015-05-28 03:08:58 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZHb4mKqwmXdtHhFD+0xgqRj2A-AKEd7vAbGvOZZP_55A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 11:08 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Assuming that we can get a fix for the fsync-failure-during-restart
>>> problem committed by the end of the week, there will be a new set of
>>> back-branch minor releases next week. Usual schedule, wrap Monday
>>> for public announcement Thursday.
>
>> What about http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20150527222142.GE5885@postgresql.org
>> ?
>
>> I believe that is also a 9.4.2 regression, and a serious one.
>
> Oh? There was nothing in the thread that suggested to me that it was
> a new-in-9.4.2 bug.
I think it is.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-05-28 03:41:29 | Re: fsync-pgdata-on-recovery tries to write to more files than previously |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-05-28 03:08:01 | Re: About that re-release ... |