| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3? |
| Date: | 2018-07-16 18:38:39 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZGn7MmMGRu4NkfxyXKSCzmvq1JvqsWm=hN=GJDMTfTKg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 10:12 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:
> Doesn't have to be a trigger, could be a CHECK constraint, datatype input
> function, etc. Admittedly, having a datatype input function that inserts to
> the table is worth a "huh?", but I'm feeling very confident that we can
> catch all such cases, and some of them might even be sensible.
Is this sentence missing a "not"? i.e. "I'm not feeling very confident"?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2018-07-16 18:41:51 | Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3? |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2018-07-16 18:33:17 | Re: Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem |