From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: multivariate statistics v14 |
Date: | 2016-04-08 19:03:49 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZ7_aUK_jTZAO_geRoJQb_+BkkpjeoZL5CAWs454uVKwQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Tomas Vondra
<tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Well, me to. But my feeling is the patch received entirely insufficient
> amount of thorough code review, considering how important part of the code
> it touches. I agree docs are an important part of a patch, but polishing
> user-level docs would hardly move the patch closer to being committable
> (especially when there's ~50kB of READMEs).
I have to admit that I was really hoping Tom would follow through on
his statement that he would look into this one, or that Dean Rasheed
would get involved. I am sure I could do a good review of this patch
given enough time, but I am also sure that it would take an amount of
time that is at least one if not two orders of magnitude more than I
put into any patch this CommitFest. I understand statistics at some
basic level, but I am not an expert on them the way some people here
are.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2016-04-08 19:09:12 | Re: PoC: Partial sort |
Previous Message | Stas Kelvich | 2016-04-08 19:03:48 | Fwd: Speedup twophase transactions |