Re: multivariate statistics v14

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: multivariate statistics v14
Date: 2016-04-08 19:13:43
Message-ID: 26335.1460142823@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Tomas Vondra
> <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> Well, me to. But my feeling is the patch received entirely insufficient
>> amount of thorough code review, considering how important part of the code
>> it touches. I agree docs are an important part of a patch, but polishing
>> user-level docs would hardly move the patch closer to being committable
>> (especially when there's ~50kB of READMEs).

> I have to admit that I was really hoping Tom would follow through on
> his statement that he would look into this one, or that Dean Rasheed
> would get involved.

I'm sorry I didn't get to it, but it's not like I have been slacking
during this commitfest. At some point, you just have to accept that
not everything we could wish will get into 9.6.

I will make it a high priority for 9.7, though.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2016-04-08 19:19:41 Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2016-04-08 19:13:21 Re: raw output from copy