| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 |
| Date: | 2017-08-17 18:32:50 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZ+OPnhE9owE0a0ig7F31-GyJkteTuKj1g3PCWgrD=2LQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Etsuro Fujita
<fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> On 2017/04/04 18:01, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
>> I rebased the patch also. Please find attached an updated version of the
>> patch.
>
> I rebased the patch to HEAD. PFA a new version of the patch.
Tom, you were instrumental in identifying what was going wrong here
initially. Any chance you'd be willing to have a look at the patch?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Steele | 2017-08-17 18:35:52 | Update low-level backup documentation to match actual behavior |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-08-17 18:14:16 | Re: [HACKERS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 |