Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6
Date: 2017-08-17 18:59:01
Message-ID: 18895.1502996341@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Etsuro Fujita
> <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> I rebased the patch to HEAD. PFA a new version of the patch.

> Tom, you were instrumental in identifying what was going wrong here
> initially. Any chance you'd be willing to have a look at the patch?

I will, but probably not for a week or so. Going eclipse-chasing.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-08-17 19:54:39 Re: expanding inheritance in partition bound order
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-08-17 18:55:49 Re: Adding support for Default partition in partitioning