Re: 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Steve Kehlet <steve(dot)kehlet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Forums postgresql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1
Date: 2015-06-05 13:39:20
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYwv+zDGxR5-x=o7QwtPVnD7-zC7e6H9VrwnQwLJAkPdw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 2:20 AM, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 05:29:51PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Here's a new version with some more fixes and improvements:
>
> I read through this version and found nothing to change. I encourage other
> hackers to study the patch, though. The surrounding code is challenging.

Andres tested this and discovered that my changes to
find_multixact_start() were far more creative than intended.
Committed and back-patched with a trivial fix for that stupidity and a
novel-length explanation of the changes.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message cchee-ob 2015-06-05 15:32:58 BDR - Failure of Primary Server - How to recover?
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2015-06-05 13:20:25 Re: Planner cost adjustments

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2015-06-05 13:42:45 Re: RFC: Remove contrib entirely
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2015-06-05 12:32:55 Re: RFC: Remove contrib entirely