| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Steve Kehlet <steve(dot)kehlet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Forums postgresql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 |
| Date: | 2015-06-05 15:43:45 |
| Message-ID: | 28397.1433519025@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 2:20 AM, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
>> I read through this version and found nothing to change. I encourage other
>> hackers to study the patch, though. The surrounding code is challenging.
> Andres tested this and discovered that my changes to
> find_multixact_start() were far more creative than intended.
> Committed and back-patched with a trivial fix for that stupidity and a
> novel-length explanation of the changes.
So where are we on this? Are we ready to schedule a new set of
back-branch releases? If not, what issues remain to be looked at?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2015-06-05 16:00:14 | Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 |
| Previous Message | cchee-ob | 2015-06-05 15:32:58 | BDR - Failure of Primary Server - How to recover? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David E. Wheeler | 2015-06-05 15:49:59 | Re: RFC: Remove contrib entirely |
| Previous Message | Neil Tiffin | 2015-06-05 15:42:29 | Re: RFC: Remove contrib entirely |