From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
Cc: | Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_amcheck contrib application |
Date: | 2021-03-12 19:24:01 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYsOuV48S1b7t4EB4acyGnOjqL1iv4jqoCSe=KdyfXxzw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 2:05 PM <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> wrote:
> I think there is a formatting glitch in lines like:
>
> 2/4 relations (50%) 187977/187978 pages (99%), (testdb )
>
> I suppose that last part should show up trimmed as '(testdb)', right?
Actually I think this is intentional. The idea is that as the line is
rewritten we don't want the close-paren to move around. It's the same
thing pg_basebackup does with its progress reporting.
Now that is not to say that some other behavior might not be better,
just that Mark was copying something that already exists, probably
because he knows that I'm finnicky about consistency....
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2021-03-12 19:31:36 | Re: pg_amcheck contrib application |
Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2021-03-12 19:13:44 | Re: documentation fix for SET ROLE |