Re: Materialized views

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Materialized views
Date: 2011-11-09 02:17:26
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYqqhrkn80vdBs2Q9P+UaFZWCqF3CN5mDD-12sg0VHU+A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> Perhaps that would be an acceptable initial version, but I'd be pretty
> disappointed and I certainly don't think we should stop there.

I agree that a built-in job scheduler would be pretty awesome, but I
think it's a completely separate project from materialized views.
Each of the two is a major project all by itself; making one into a
dependency of the other is a recipe for failure.

In view of Kevin's success with SSI, I'm very pleased to see him
picking this out as his next target. If and when it gets done, this
will be a great, great feature. And we shouldn't be afraid to start
small and move incrementally toward what we really want.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-11-09 02:24:59 Re: 9.1.2 ?
Previous Message Greg Smith 2011-11-09 01:31:41 Re: 9.1.2 ?