Re: 9.1.2 ?

Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> I was curious how 9.0 fared last year for comparison, here's that data:

> Version Date Days Weeks
> 9.0.0 09/20/10
> 9.0.1 10/04/10 14 2.0
> 9.0.2 12/16/10 73 10.4
> 9.0.3 01/31/11 46 6.6
> 9.0.4 04/18/11 77 11.0
> 9.0.5 09/26/11 161 23.0

> So the average for the first three point releases was around 6 weeks apart.

The 9.0.1 and 9.0.3 releases were both forced by security issues,
so I think that's an unusually low average.

Having said that, if enough people think that those backup issues are
critical-data-loss problems, I won't stand in the way of making a
release now. But like you, I'm not exactly convinced we're done with
those issues.

regards, tom lane