| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: parallel dump/restore code on WIndows |
| Date: | 2012-04-06 01:27:31 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYmgN38oCUF-D9XAzSuGmNBkmTMoLF_cQK27fqGYVevvw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> Why was this code:
>
> #ifdef WIN32
> if (parallel_init_done && GetCurrentThreadId() != mainThreadId)
> ExitThread(code);
> #endif
>
>
> removed from dumputils.c by commit 5e86c61a7eec0fdc6961493a150159fa8fc63b1c?
> The commit message doesn't refer to it at all.
>
> I don't understand it at all, and there is nothing in Joachim's latest patch
> that would call ExitThread() from an exit handler, so the effect seems
> likely to me to break parallel windows processing in nasty ways if called
> from a worker thread, although I haven't tested it.
Ah, snap. That's a mistake on my part. Sorry.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Shigeru HANADA | 2012-04-06 02:41:29 | Re: WIP: Collecting statistics on CSV file data |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2012-04-06 01:24:35 | Re: BUG #6522: PostgreSQL does not start |