| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Israel Barth Rubio <barthisrael(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Apparent bug in WAL summarizer process (hung state) |
| Date: | 2024-06-25 19:48:07 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYfMLM1gWUAG8RD9=f1eb-L09dETzohm=j8X_Cr8zpvqg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 1:56 PM Israel Barth Rubio
<barthisrael(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I've been playing a bit with the incremental backup feature which might come as
> part of the 17 release, and I think I hit a possible bug in the WAL summarizer
> process.
>
> The issue that I face refers to the summarizer process getting into a hung state.
> When the issue is triggered, it keeps in an infinite loop trying to process a WAL
> file that no longer exists. It apparently comes up only when I perform changes to
> `wal_summarize` GUC and reload Postgres, while there is some load in Postgres
> which makes it recycle WAL files.
Yeah, this is a bug. It seems that the WAL summarizer process, when
restarted, wants to restart from wherever it was previously
summarizing WAL, which is correct if that WAL is still around, but if
summarize_wal has been turned off in the meanwhile, it might not be
correct. Here's a patch to fix that.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v1-0001-Prevent-summarizer-hang-when-summarize_wal-turn-o.patch | application/octet-stream | 8.1 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2024-06-25 19:51:24 | Re: Apparent bug in WAL summarizer process (hung state) |
| Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2024-06-25 19:26:46 | Re: improve predefined roles documentation |