Re: Add regression tests for COLLATE

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robins Tharakan <tharakan(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add regression tests for COLLATE
Date: 2013-07-06 13:12:15
Message-ID: CA+TgmoY_52_utCx=XOXPeGKBodz1+dAAgM2aOje=kDS8fd21Lw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 2013-07-03 14:17:20 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> I agree. I think it'd be a good idea to get the buildfarm to run the
>> existing collate.utf8.linux test regularly on platforms where it
>> passes, but this particular approach is valuable mostly because
>> (supposedly) it was going to work everywhere. However, it doesn't.
>
> Hm. What about extending the existing resultmap logic to make that
> possible in general? E.g. don't run the test if a file is mapped to an
> empty expected file.

Not a bad thought.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2013-07-06 13:27:53 Re: Add regression tests for COLLATE
Previous Message Robert Haas 2013-07-06 13:07:54 Re: MVCC catalog access