Re: fix hard-coded index in make_partition_op_expr

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: fix hard-coded index in make_partition_op_expr
Date: 2017-05-17 18:43:12
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYXYjO6=KVw6VTrxnLsymgxR7dr3QFfsAyAcJJjZrT0eQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 5:38 AM, Jeevan Ladhe
<jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> While browsing through the partitioning code, I noticed that a recent commit
> f8bffe9e6d700fd34759a92e47930ce9ba7dcbd5, which fixes multi-column range
> partitioning constraints, introduced a function make_partition_op_expr, that
> takes keynum as a input parameter to identify the index of the partition
> key.
> In case of range partition we can have multiple partition keys but for list
> partition we have only one. Considering that, I think following code does
> not
> cause any side-effect logically(and may be a oversight while moving the code
> from function get_qual_for_list to this function):
>
> saopexpr->inputcollid = key->partcollation[0];
> saopexpr->args = list_make2(arg1, arg2);
>
> But as we have keynum now, should we be using it to index
> key->partcollation,
> instead of a hard coded '0'.

Agreed. Committed your patch.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-05-17 18:44:31 Re: pgindent (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Preventive maintenance in advance of pgindent run.)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-05-17 18:41:16 Re: pgindent (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Preventive maintenance in advance of pgindent run.)