| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Brar Piening <brar(at)gmx(dot)de>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Review of VS 2010 support patches |
| Date: | 2011-08-10 13:21:33 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYX4AiMF5exWUsgZXJWr_Vd0qtiGxccNR0wyp-YDZJJHQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> I am no perl expert, but I see we are using this already today - in
> code written by you in one case ;) I'd assume it was just following
> the same standard... If the other way is the way to do it today, I see
> no reason not to change it to use that.
This is the first I'm hearing of use parent - has that been around
long enough that we needn't worry about breaking old Perl versions?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2011-08-10 13:25:24 | Re: Review of VS 2010 support patches |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2011-08-10 13:03:40 | Re: Review of VS 2010 support patches |