| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Brar Piening <brar(at)gmx(dot)de>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Review of VS 2010 support patches |
| Date: | 2011-08-10 13:26:22 |
| Message-ID: | 4E4286FE.3090501@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 08/10/2011 09:21 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Magnus Hagander<magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> I am no perl expert, but I see we are using this already today - in
>> code written by you in one case ;) I'd assume it was just following
>> the same standard... If the other way is the way to do it today, I see
>> no reason not to change it to use that.
> This is the first I'm hearing of use parent - has that been around
> long enough that we needn't worry about breaking old Perl versions?
>
Good question. Maybe not.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2011-08-10 13:28:35 | Re: Review of VS 2010 support patches |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2011-08-10 13:25:24 | Re: Review of VS 2010 support patches |