| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jacob Burroughs <jburroughs(at)instructure(dot)com>, Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, hlinnaka <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
| Subject: | Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs |
| Date: | 2024-08-15 14:48:59 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYOZ4kQsAn8S40-g7fsWwqfB3jZPsZerFgH4u4MYu9-rA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 2:04 PM Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> wrote:
> Applied all 0002 feedback. Although I used Min(proto,
> PG_PROTOCOL_LATEST) because Max results in the wrong value.
Picky, picky. :-)
Committed.
> Makes sense. I'm not in too much of a hurry with this specific one. So
> I'll leave it like this for now and hopefully someone else responds.
> If this becomes close to being the final unmerged patch of this
> patchset, I'll probably cut my losses and create a patch that adds a
> function instead.
Maybe reorder the series to put that one later then.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexander Lakhin | 2024-08-15 15:00:00 | Re: Remove dependence on integer wrapping |
| Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2024-08-15 14:41:05 | Re: Adding clarification to description of IPC wait events XactGroupUpdate and ProcArrayGroupUpdate |