| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Make query cancellation keys longer |
| Date: | 2025-02-24 17:24:01 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYEe5LmXdOLZow_CW94oGYYnSwgRqFg7p+hpW787b-zJw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 9:58 AM Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> wrote:
> My patchset in the other protocol thread needed a rebase. So I took
> that as an opportunity to rebase this patchset on top of it, because
> this seems to be the protocol change that we can most easily push over
> the finish line.
I'm still not really convinced about that -- see comments upthread --
but I committed 0001 and 0002, which appear to be straightforward bug
fixes.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Steele | 2025-02-24 17:30:35 | Re: Fix logging for invalid recovery timeline |
| Previous Message | Ilia Evdokimov | 2025-02-24 17:12:11 | Re: explain analyze rows=%.0f |