Re: Some code cleanup for pgbench and pg_verifybackup

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Some code cleanup for pgbench and pg_verifybackup
Date: 2021-07-28 14:28:13
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYERso6gAymR1XcxaJC8ZmNKY49QTPTuY2ceXNVTXmXhQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 11:18 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> I have been looking at that. Here are some findings:
> - In pg_archivecleanup, CleanupPriorWALFiles() does not bother
> exit()'ing with an error code. Shouldn't we worry about reporting
> that correctly? It seems strange to not inform users about paths that
> would be broken, as that could bloat the archives without one knowing
> about it.
> - In pg_basebackup.c, ReceiveTarAndUnpackCopyChunk() would not
> exit() when failing to change permissions for non-WIN32.
> - pg_recvlogical is missing a failure handling for fstat(), as of
> 5c0de38.
> - pg_verifybackup is in the wrong, as mentioned upthread.
>
> Thoughts? All that does not seem to enter into the category of things
> worth back-patching, except for pg_verifybackup.

I think all of these are reasonable fixes. In the case of
pg_basebackup, a chmod() failure doesn't necessarily oblige us to give
up and exit; we could presumably still write the data. But it may be
best to give up and exit. The other cases appear to be clear bugs.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gilles Darold 2021-07-28 14:29:34 Re: Case expression pushdown
Previous Message John W Higgins 2021-07-28 14:23:50 Re: Have I found an interval arithmetic bug?