Re: Assembling "top features" list for beta announcement

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)berkus(dot)org>
Cc: Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Assembling "top features" list for beta announcement
Date: 2017-04-09 02:09:09
Message-ID: CA+TgmoY4PJ95VyE3e-n=oyccU3cp84KOzQLRVnbRZwZity76gg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)berkus(dot)org> wrote:
> From a PR standpoint, 5 is the absolute max, and 3 is better. Really,
> the ideal situation is a set of features which can be closely tied
> together around a simple theme.

I kinda don't buy this, but I suppose if I had to pick three, I'd pick
partitioning, logical replication, and improved parallel query. If I
could add a fourth I'd add SCRAM, particularly because that really
needs testing and driver support.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Banck 2017-04-09 08:43:09 Re: Assembling "top features" list for beta announcement
Previous Message Darren Duncan 2017-04-08 20:49:54 Re: Assembling "top features" list for beta announcement