Re: Assembling "top features" list for beta announcement

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)berkus(dot)org>
Cc: Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Assembling "top features" list for beta announcement
Date: 2017-04-09 14:34:57
Message-ID: 0ea3c15f-f0ca-14fa-62db-928f2fbb36a8@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 04/08/2017 07:09 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)berkus(dot)org> wrote:
>> From a PR standpoint, 5 is the absolute max, and 3 is better. Really,
>> the ideal situation is a set of features which can be closely tied
>> together around a simple theme.
>
> I kinda don't buy this, but I suppose if I had to pick three, I'd pick
> partitioning, logical replication, and improved parallel query. If I
> could add a fourth I'd add SCRAM, particularly because that really
> needs testing and driver support.

3-5 is the sweet spot for a PR. I think SCRAM being listed is a very
good thing.

JD

--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-04-09 21:56:35 Re: Assembling "top features" list for beta announcement
Previous Message Michael Banck 2017-04-09 09:09:36 Re: Assembling "top features" list for beta announcement